Difference between revisions of "Talk:List by Groups"

From Touhou Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Reviewing)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
*While I realize this is not the ideal place to add a comment on this subject, it 'will' likely be noticed before a comment on a single album page - there are a number of articles with reviews and review stubs.  Stubs merely asking for a genre citation, although, as stated, there are actual reviews contained in a number of the articles, for example [[紅魔狂詩曲 Scarlet Rapsodia]] - perhaps I am just being anal, but to my knowledge a wiki was for factual information, not the opinions of a single fan.  Basically, anyone have strong objections to their removal?  Factual information such as genre can be worked into the albums info box if need be - [[User:Schine|Schine]] 23:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 
*While I realize this is not the ideal place to add a comment on this subject, it 'will' likely be noticed before a comment on a single album page - there are a number of articles with reviews and review stubs.  Stubs merely asking for a genre citation, although, as stated, there are actual reviews contained in a number of the articles, for example [[紅魔狂詩曲 Scarlet Rapsodia]] - perhaps I am just being anal, but to my knowledge a wiki was for factual information, not the opinions of a single fan.  Basically, anyone have strong objections to their removal?  Factual information such as genre can be worked into the albums info box if need be - [[User:Schine|Schine]] 23:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 +
:It can be considered useful information when one is looking for new albums to listen to. Mentioning outstanding or characteristic tracks can help as well. I agree that personal opinions should not be presented as facts, but there is enough room for both on the wiki as long as they are labelled properly. [[Special:Contributions/129.31.67.177|129.31.67.177]] 00:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  
 
----
 
----

Revision as of 00:30, 1 January 2009

Reviewing[edit]

  • While I realize this is not the ideal place to add a comment on this subject, it 'will' likely be noticed before a comment on a single album page - there are a number of articles with reviews and review stubs. Stubs merely asking for a genre citation, although, as stated, there are actual reviews contained in a number of the articles, for example 紅魔狂詩曲 Scarlet Rapsodia - perhaps I am just being anal, but to my knowledge a wiki was for factual information, not the opinions of a single fan. Basically, anyone have strong objections to their removal? Factual information such as genre can be worked into the albums info box if need be - Schine 23:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
It can be considered useful information when one is looking for new albums to listen to. Mentioning outstanding or characteristic tracks can help as well. I agree that personal opinions should not be presented as facts, but there is enough room for both on the wiki as long as they are labelled properly. 129.31.67.177 00:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Would anyone please add Maikaze? I have many lyrics for them, and the last 3 discs have really awseome music, but i'm really bad at this wiki stuff... XD


Are there any broader sections you can fit these in?


there's currently 299 wanted pages, and a huge number of them are coming from the many dead links on this page. Would anyone care if I just removed the link code from every name in this list of groups that doesn't have a page made for it already? The majority of names in this list are red as it is, and it shouldn't be a problem for people to just edit this page to add the link code on whatever name they make a page for when they do make the page.

I went ahead and did it. Now there's only 157 wanted pages, which makes it much easier to sort through the wanted pages list to find things people can make pages for without every other one being from this page. If someone wants, they could still rollback the change I just made.

Another group to add: NJK Record.