Difference between revisions of "Touhou Wiki talk:Project Characters"

From Touhou Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Suggestion: add skill lists for playable characters: new section)
m (Suggestion: add skill lists for playable characters)
Line 69: Line 69:
[[User:MapleTree|MapleTree]] ([[User talk:MapleTree|talk]]) 23:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
[[User:MapleTree|MapleTree]] ([[User talk:MapleTree|talk]]) 23:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
:I'd be for it.
:A template would keep consistent formatting as well as easy implementation. [[User:Nazeo|♥★♦]] ([[User talk:Nazeo|talk]]) 01:10, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:10, 2 March 2015

High priority pages[edit]

I don't think that a page is of a higher priority, because it has more views. I think that character pages that are more important to the games' story should be of a higher priority. Like Kanako, Satori or Byakuren. ☢ Quwanti 18:10, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

True. It was just an idea to get our more-viewed pages up to standards more quickly. For, uh, PR purposes, or something? I dunno. Ideally all character pages should have the same priority, of course. ― Darkslime 19:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
I'd personally think in terms of content and the amount of <insert summary here> for a lot of the pages would be of priority. That would make some pretty good PR; having content and cover the bases. What do you guys think? ♥★♦ (talk) 22:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Well, I don't think it would hurt if we wait some longer filling information for Wriggle Nightbug, due to her lack of importance. Kanako has much more impact on the world of Gensokyo and is thus much more important. I'd like to see those characters to be filled much faster, and a higher priority. ☢ Quwanti 23:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I suppose the to-do list is a bit more important. I'm going to remove the high priority list if there are no objections. ― Darkslime 13:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Merge with Project Daikaitei[edit]

Since this is basically a restart of the work we started last year, I propose merging this into Daikaitei, or vice versa. I prefer the former, since Daikaitei is a cool name. Momiji (talk) 21:44, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Nevermind. Momiji (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Moving banner to talk page[edit]

I'm moving banner in all characters' article to related talk page as it should not be appeared in the article, just like what it is in Wikipedia in which any project page notice were in the talk page - KyoriAsh (talk) 14:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Concerning redirect for Reisen[edit]

I was thinking that this redirect should instead become a disambiguation page so users have got the opportunity of choosing whether they want to go to Reisen I or II. Any thoughts? Tony64 (Talk/Con.) 02:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

A disambig page is unecessary. You have Reisen point to one, with the note "(Reisen redirects here.) For the character introduced in Imperishable Night/Silent Sinner in Blue, see Reisen Udonge Inaba/Reisen (Silent Sinner in Blue)."
I am partial to having Reisen point to the character from SSiB, since the other has a multitude of names associated with her (such as Udonge). But whatever works. - Kiefmaster99 (talk) 07:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Suggestion: add skill lists for playable characters[edit]

An idea expanding upon listing the spellcards. It includes skill cards from the fighting games, players shoots from integer games, bombs from SA (as they aren't "proper" cards), phantasmagoria games specials. Includes related attacks (if any). Here's a basic, BASIC, preview for Marisa:

(I changed background from palegreen to blueviolet because sure why not. Color not final.) Character pages don't have the spell cards written directly on them, rather, they make a link to List of Spell Cards and then lift the table from there. Needs a new template (SCTable has a column called "Stage". Maybe change it to "Usage" put there once and not everywhere else). I suggest making a page called List of Skills, put the tables there, and then link to make the character pages less cluttered (talking about page source). Also it will need to expand the IaMP pages (see "Witch Leyline"). Putting in the talk page for discussion before doing anything.

MapleTree (talk) 23:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

I'd be for it.
A template would keep consistent formatting as well as easy implementation. ♥★♦ (talk) 01:10, 2 March 2015 (UTC)