Talk:Urban Legend in Limbo OST

From Touhou Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Harry Potter reference[edit]

I'm not suggesting that this reference to Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets is a definite, but it is plausible, hence why I used the word 'could'. This reference is a possibility, because both the Harry Potter book and this CD's got the same title format as '<name>と秘密の<room>' or '<name> and the <room> of Secrets'. Both works also uses the full name of the character: 'Harry Potter and the...'/'Sumireko Usami and the...'

I like to note that this wiki is full of interpretations that could also be considered speculation, but they still exist because they're plausible. I also like to state that I did not know the reference was removed the first time; I've had the edit page opened for a long while when I was adding track lengths and the wiki did not notice me for any edits that were already made. Tony64 (Talk/Con.) 16:51, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

I also don't like to add speculations to the wiki, but if that speculation has at least some background information that can co relate with the subject, then it's plausible enough to, at least, add it to the "Additional Information" section fo said article. As Tony said, the sentence it's not saying it's a direct reference but it may be.
Sumireko Usami and the Clubroom of Secrets (宇佐見菫子と秘密の部室, Usami Sumireko to Himitsu no Bushitsu).
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (ハリー・ポッターと秘密の部屋, Harī Pottā to Himitsu no Heya).
The sub-title looks oddly alike the books' name (XY and the Z of Secrets). It even has the same sentence 秘密の部 秘密の部 in both parts, just the last makes the difference.
To me, this is enought information to reference it in the article. --Camilo113 (talk) 18:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Others appear to share a similar sentiment, apparently, but as far as I know, it is our general rule that we try to stay away from speculation as much as possible (except for maybe on the fandom pages). Just because the wiki still contains a lot of speculation on the major pages does not make it right. However, I appear to have an unpopular view when it comes to this particular piece of speculation, so I will go ahead and add it back. Code Slasher (talk) 18:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)